Skip to main content
Ontology is TextQL’s unified semantic layer — a shared source of truth for metric definitions, entity relationships, and business logic that eliminates conflicting definitions across teams. This guide covers the full setup: getting content in, defining objects and metrics, configuring how Ana loads it, and reviewing and auditing changes.
Ontology editor showing Files, Graph, Reviews, and History tabs

Before You Start

The quality of your ontology at launch is a function of the institutional knowledge you bring to it. Before opening the editor, gather:
  • Metric definitions — how your team actually calculates revenue, churn, conversion, activation. If different teams use different definitions, collect all of them. Ontology is where you canonicalize.
  • Existing SQL and notebooks — recurring analyses your team runs are direct evidence of what Ana will need to produce. These are your ground truth.
  • Schema documentation — any notes on non-obvious joins, unreliable columns, or connector-specific quirks that wouldn’t be apparent from table names alone.
  • Tribal knowledge — meeting notes, Slack threads, recorded data reviews, onboarding docs, ad-hoc write-ups where your team has captured how numbers behave, which fields have edge cases, or why a given metric is calculated the way it is.
You don’t need to format any of this. Raw SQL, Notion links, Slack exports — drop it in. The goal is to start with signal, not structure.

Build incrementally, not exhaustively

Ontology is a living semantic layer. Launch with what you have, then let usage drive what gets added next. Every Thread surfaces gaps — a definition someone corrects mid-analysis, a join Ana had to infer, a rule that keeps coming up across Threads. Non-admin users propose enrichments as they work, and those come through an approval flow for you to review and commit. Don’t try to complete Ontology before your first Thread. Start with your highest-stakes metric definitions, get Ana running against real questions, and let the gaps tell you where to go next.

Step-by-Step Guide

There are three ways to populate Ontology — all give you access to the same full feature set:

Method 1: GitHub Integration

For teams with existing documentation or metric definitions already in Git.

Method 2: Create Files Directly

Build in the UI editor — no Git setup required.

Method 3: Build Through Threads

Let Ana capture knowledge as you run analyses. No admin access required.

Method 1: GitHub Integration

If your team already maintains business logic, metric definitions, or schema documentation in a Git repository, connect it directly. TextQL syncs the repository into Ontology — files appear as context Ana can read, and changes flow in both directions. This is the right choice when you want version control on ontology changes, multiple teams contributing via PR workflow, or you already have a documentation repository. Why connect Git
  • Edit outside TextQL — your team can edit ontology files directly in GitHub, VS Code, or any editor, and changes sync back
  • Use existing repos — if your organization already has a documentation repository, connect it and bring everything in without migrating manually
  • Pull requests: optionally make a pull request on the connected Git host the merge gate. A change approved in the in-app Reviews flow is proposed as a pull request, and only applies once your team merges it
  • Works with any Git host — GitHub, GitLab, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, or any standard Git remote
Connecting a repository Click Connect Git in the top right of the Ontology editor. Choose your authentication method:
The easiest option for GitHub users, and the only one that can open pull requests on GitHub. Click Install GitHub App and you’ll be redirected to GitHub to install the TextQL Ontology Sync app on your organization. Once installed, select the repository and branch to connect.The app needs Contents (read and write) and Pull requests (read and write) repository permissions; the second is what the Create PRs push mode uses.
Connect to Git modal showing GitHub App and push mode options
Push mode When Ana or a team member makes a change, you choose how it gets written back to your repo: Create PRs requires GitHub App authentication — a personal access token or SSH key can push commits, but cannot open pull requests on your behalf. What the review flow looks like with Create PRs
  1. Ana (or a team member) proposes a change; it appears in Ontology → Reviews as usual.
  2. A reviewer approves it in Ontology. Nothing changes in the ontology yet: TextQL pushes the change to its own branch and opens a pull request against your connected branch. The review shows Awaiting PR merge with a link to it.
  3. Your team reviews the pull request in GitHub, using your normal checks, CODEOWNERS, and merge rules.
  4. When the pull request is merged, the next sync pulls the commit back and the change becomes live in the ontology. The review flips to Approved.
  5. If the pull request is closed without merging, the review returns to Pending review so it can be revised or re-proposed.
Each approved change gets its own pull request, so your team can accept some and reject others independently. On AWS CodeCommit, Create PRs opens a pull request for pushed changes but does not gate them: the change applies in Ontology when it is approved there. Merge gating is GitHub-only today. Push mode can be changed at any time from the Git sync panel — you don’t need to reconnect the repository. Bidirectional sync Once connected, the integration syncs in both directions:
  • TextQL → Git: Approved changes in Ontology are pushed to the repo — as commits on the connected branch with Direct push, or as a pull request awaiting your merge with Create PRs
  • Git → TextQL: Changes committed to the repo’s connected branch are pulled into Ontology automatically, typically within a few minutes
When you first connect a repo, Ontology imports the repository’s existing file structure. Folders, subfolders, and files are brought in as-is — you can then apply role-based access and auto-attach settings on top.

Method 2: Create Files Directly

You can skip Git entirely. The Ontology editor has a built-in file editor — create folders, write files, and manage everything directly inside TextQL without connecting a repository. Navigating the editor The Ontology editor has four tabs:
  • Files — the main file browser. Create folders, add files, and edit content.
  • Graph — a visual map of all files in your Files tab. Shows how your defined objects, metrics, and relationships connect to each other.
  • Reviews — proposed changes from Ana waiting for approval.
  • History — a full audit log of every change made to Ontology.
The Files tab is the primary surface. Click any folder to open it and see its files. The main panel shows the selected file with three sub-tabs: Preview (rendered content), Source (raw text), and Properties (auto-attach and access settings). Creating a file Click + New at the top of the file browser. A dropdown gives you three options:
  • Create new file — opens the editor to write a file directly
  • Upload files — upload an existing file from your machine (PDFs, images, CSVs, etc.)
  • Create new folder — add a new folder to organize your files
Creating a file in the Ontology editor
When creating a file, give it a name and write your content directly in the editor. Add an optional commit message to describe what the file is — this shows up in the History tab. Click Create to save. The file is immediately available to Ana. File types Markdown is the most common. Use it for anything you’d explain to a new analyst in plain language: how revenue is calculated, which accounts to exclude, what the pipeline stages mean. .tql files are the other major type. They store formal object, metric, and link definitions — the structured model Ana compiles directly into queries. You don’t write these by hand; they’re authored by Ana through Threads and stored automatically in the Files tab. See .tql Files below for details. Python files unlock something more powerful: Ana can call these scripts directly during analysis — for hitting internal APIs, applying company-specific business logic, or any calculation that would take too long to re-derive each time.
PDFs and images cannot be set to auto-attach for performance reasons. To have Ana always reference one, add a pointer in your ANA.md: “At the start of every Thread, read data-dictionary.pdf.”
Organizing with folders Organize by business domain, not file type. Each folder should represent a context Ana might need:
A few principles:
  • One topic per file. A focused revenue-definition.md is more useful than a finance-misc.md that grows unbounded. Atomic files are easier to version, permission, and retrieve.
  • Index every folder. A short README.md at the top of each folder — what’s here, when to use it — lets Ana navigate a large ontology without loading every file inside it.
  • Treat it like code: stale definitions cause real errors. Unlike human-facing docs that get skipped, Ana follows instructions precisely. An outdated revenue definition produces wrong numbers silently. Update Ontology when business logic changes.
ANA.md — the org-wide entry point ANA.md is a special filename. Any file named ANA.md anywhere in your ontology is automatically loaded into every single chat, for every user, regardless of role or connector. No configuration needed.
ANA.md open in Ontology editor
Use ANA.md for rules that apply universally across your org:
Keep ANA.md short and universal. Role-specific or connector-specific instructions belong in their own files with targeted auto-attach settings.

Method 3: Build Through Threads (Non-Admin Friendly)

Every analysis has the potential to make Ontology better. As you work in Threads with Ana, you’ll surface definitions worth saving, rules that should apply everywhere, or data quirks Ana figured out mid-analysis. You can ask Ana to propose any of those as additions to Ontology — nothing you submit affects anyone else until an admin approves it.
Ana creating ontology from a Thread
What you can propose Any plain-language knowledge that would help Ana answer questions more accurately:
  • A metric definition or calculation rule (“exclude refunded orders from revenue”)
  • A fiscal calendar or date convention (“Q1 starts February 1”)
  • A data quirk or known issue (“the status column in orders uses 1/0, not true/false”)
  • A business rule or exclusion (“don’t include test accounts in any analysis”)
  • A clarification about what a table or column represents
  • A correction to an existing definition you know is wrong
How to ask At any point in a Thread, just say it in plain language:
  • “Save what you learned about this connector to Ontology.”
  • “Add a rule that we always exclude refunds from net revenue.”
  • “The churn calculation we just worked out — can you save that?”
  • “Update the Finance folder with the new fiscal year start date.”
  • “What did you learn today that would be useful to save?”
Ana knows the structure of your ontology — which folders exist, what files are already in them — and places new content in the right location. She’ll draft the change and show you exactly what she’s proposing before anything is submitted. The approval flow Ana never writes directly to Ontology. Every change goes through a review step first. After Ana drafts a proposed change, you see it in the Thread with two options:
  • Approve — applies the change immediately
  • Discard — throws it away, nothing is saved
If you have Editor access to the target folder, you can approve directly in the Thread. If not, Ana routes it to the Reviews tab for an admin to approve. See Role & Access for how folder access levels are configured. Once approved, the change is live for every user on your team.
Ontology Reviews tab showing a pending patch with diff and Approve/Reject buttons
Read the diff before approving. An incorrect rule will be applied to every future Thread for every user who loads that file.
What Ana captures well
  • Schema quirks — non-obvious join keys, unexpected column encodings, table-specific behavior discovered during analysis
  • Business definitions — if you correct Ana mid-Thread (“actually, ‘active users’ means last 30 days, not 7”), she can save that immediately
  • Query patterns — complex logic that comes up repeatedly for a specific connector or metric
  • Org rules — anything you find yourself repeating across Threads
After a few rounds of this, Ontology builds itself around the work your team is actually doing.

Ontology Query - .tql Files

Want the full specification? The .tql Manual is the complete deep-dive — every language feature, builtin, pattern, and worked example, written for admins, power users, developers, and anyone setting up or monitoring .tql files from the ground up. The section below is a working summary.
The core primitive for knowledge management in TextQL is the git-backed ontology repo — business definitions, SQL templates, notes, examples, and operating rules living in the same versioned file tree and cross-referencing one another naturally. .tql is the SQL-native semantic modeling language for that repository. It replaces application-stored ontology objects with reviewable files that define governed metrics, dimensions, filters, joins, and runtime-aware access logic, while still compiling to warehouse-native SQL. A .tql file declares typed parameters, encodes business logic, and produces consistent SQL regardless of how it’s invoked. No hidden query compiler; the SQL your team authors is the SQL that runs. .tql is also where the explore → learn → solidify loop closes. Ana starts by writing ad-hoc SQL to answer questions — discovering how your tables connect, what your metrics actually mean, which edge cases apply. As that understanding matures, it gets promoted into .tql files: probabilistic inference replaced by deterministic logic. Every time Ana figures out how your team calculates a metric, that knowledge can be locked in as a governed definition Ana will apply consistently from that point forward. .tql files are most commonly authored by Ana through Threads and stored automatically in the Files tab — though you can also write or edit them directly. To have Ana update one, ask her to revise it during a Thread — the result goes through the standard approval flow before going live. TextQL has two SQL generation modes: High-stakes metrics — ARR, churn, conversion, activation — should not be re-derived on every question. The LLM resolves intent and supplies parameters; your pre-authored SQL handles execution.

Features

Typed query interfaces A .tql file exposes a small typed API to callers. Required params, nullable params, defaults, set labels, expression-backed set signatures, and filter shapes can be inspected before execution. Semantic-view query surfaces The standard reusable pattern is a view with metrics, dimensions, and filters. Callers get a compact surface. Authors keep SQL structure, join logic, grouping behavior, and filter rules in code. Safe parameter interpolation Caller values do not become SQL structure directly. They render as bind values or inline-escaped values. Authored fragments are the only way to introduce SQL structure. Transparent SQL assembly .tql uses sanitized string interpolation and lambdas instead of hiding logic behind a query compiler. Authors can represent imperfect warehouse reality directly, including hand-tuned SQL, custom formulas, conditional joins, role-playing dimensions, warehouse-specific functions, and messy legacy conventions that are hard to encode in conventional semantic layers. Governed arbitrary filtering filterWhere allows flexible caller filters without raw SQL from the caller. The author controls filter keys, SQL expressions, and allowed operators. Modular reuse Imports allow table backing definitions, relation modules, dimensions, measures, filters, key lists, and query templates to live in separate files. This keeps definitions small without hiding behavior in application state. Because Set signatures can reference pure expressions such as obj_order.metric_keys or obj_order.dimension_keys ++ obj_customer.dimension_keys, multi-file modules can define the allowed query surface once and reuse it in entrypoints. Access-aware modeling .tql can branch on role names and client attributes through _tql. This lets teams model tenant scoping, regional scoping, role-based visibility, and personalization in versioned files. Versioned governance Because .tql lives in the ontology repo, semantic changes can be proposed, diffed, reviewed, approved, reverted, and audited like software changes. Ana-readable context Ana can read a .tql file and learn the business terms, valid dimensions, trusted joins, metric definitions, filter grammar, runtime access rules, and final SQL shape. This makes .tql both executable code and high-signal context. Current limitations
  • Date and Timestamp params are strings at validation time. Document format expectations in comments.
  • Plain SQL bodies only support param-name interpolation. Use expression-style .tql for computed fragments.
  • Structured source assembly with compiler-managed join aliases is a design direction, not the current authoring surface. Today, joins are authored as SQL fragments.

Short Language Spec

File forms .tql files have two common shapes. Plain SQL template — use this when the file is basically SQL with direct parameters. In a plain body, interpolation is limited to parameter names.
Expression body — use this when you need branching, reusable fragments, imports, helper functions, semantic views, or conditional joins. The expression body must evaluate to a SqlFragment, usually with sql"..." or sql'' ... ''.
Imports Project templates support imports between .tql files. Relative imports resolve from the importing file. Absolute imports resolve from the project root.
Whole-record imports bind the exported record to a local name. Destructured imports bind named fields from the exported record. Params block Parameters are declared in a params { ... } block. Use one declaration per line and no commas.
? marks a nullable parameter. Omitted nullable params resolve to null. Non-nullable params without defaults are required. Defaults are supported for scalar literals and empty lists or sets. Expressions
  • Literals: numbers, strings, booleans, null, lists, and records.
  • Bindings: let ... in ..., evaluated in order. Duplicate binding names are rejected.
  • Records: { expr = sql"b.name", join = sql"JOIN buyers b ON ..." }.
  • Record shorthand: { expr, join }.
  • Field access: dims.buyer.expr.
  • Conditionals: if condition then value else value. Only the selected branch is evaluated.
  • Lambdas: \col val -> sql"${col} = ${val}". Function application is whitespace-separated.
  • Set matching: matchSet dimensions { "buyer" -> ... }.
SQL fragments and interpolation Use sql"..." for short fragments and sql'' ... '' for multiline SQL. Inside sql, ${expr} evaluates an expression and lowers it into SQL. Scalar values become bind values or escaped inline values. SqlFragment values splice in directly. Never quote interpolations yourself. WHERE country = ${country} is correct; WHERE country = '${country}' will be rejected. Nullable params are not omitted automatically — use branching for optional predicates:
List interpolation already adds parentheses. Write WHERE id IN ${ids}, not WHERE id IN (${ids}).

Supported Parameter Types

Append ? to make any type nullable — the param resolves to null when omitted. Params without ? and without a default are required. For the full language reference — imports, runtime context (_tql), row-level access scoping, builtins, and complete worked examples — see the .tql Manual.

Walkthrough


Dynamic Loading — How Ana Uses Your Ontology

Ana doesn’t load your entire ontology into every Thread. She navigates it — reading files selectively based on what’s relevant to the conversation, the user’s role, and the connector they’re using.

Auto-attached files

Auto-attached files load automatically at the start of every applicable chat. Set this on a file’s Properties tab.
File properties showing Auto Attach settings
When auto-attach is on, you can scope it so the file only loads when the right conditions are met: Conditions can be combined — for example, auto-attach the Finance fiscal calendar only for Finance-role users on the Snowflake connector. Keep the always-on list short. Every auto-attached file adds to the context of every Thread. Files that are only sometimes relevant load faster and more accurately when left as on-demand.

On-demand files

On-demand files have no auto-attach conditions set. Ana finds and loads them during the Thread based on what the user is asking. Most files in your ontology should be on-demand. The primary way to guide on-demand loading is a navigation table — add one to ANA.md or a folder-level README.md and Ana will know exactly which file to load when a topic comes up: When a user asks “how many daily active users did we have this week?”, Ana matches the trigger and loads metrics/daily_active_users.md directly — without pulling in anything else.

Practical example

A Finance analyst chatting with Snowflake gets ANA.md + fiscal-calendar.md + snowflake-schema-notes.md auto-loaded. Ana finds brand-kit.md and utm-conventions.md on demand. The Go-To-Market files are invisible to this user entirely.

History & Version Control

Every change to Ontology is tracked — who made it, when, and exactly what changed.

The Reviews tab

The Reviews tab is where Ana’s proposed changes wait for approval. Each review shows:
  • Who proposed it — the user (via Ana) who initiated the change
  • The source thread — a link to the Thread where the change was proposed
  • The diff — a line-by-line view of what’s being added or removed
  • The target file — which file will be affected
Ontology Reviews tab showing a pending patch with diff and Approve/Reject buttons
Click Approve to commit the change immediately, or Reject to discard it. Admins can always approve. Users with Editor access on the target folder can also approve patches for files within that folder. See Role & Access for how access levels are configured.

The History tab

The History tab shows a chronological log of every change applied to Ontology — approved patches, manual edits, file uploads, deletions, and imports.
Ontology History tab showing a list of changes with diffs
Each entry shows the file changed, who changed it, when, and the full diff. If a change introduced something incorrect, click the entry to see the old content and create a new patch to revert it. If your ontology is connected to a Git repository, all history is also reflected in your repo’s commit log.

What to Build First

If you’re starting from scratch, prioritize in this order:
  1. ANA.md with org-wide rules and a navigation table
  2. One folder per major business domain with a README.md in each
  3. Metric definitions as .md files — revenue, ARR, churn, conversion first
  4. Objects and links (via Ana chat) for the 3–5 tables your team queries most
  5. .tql metric queries for calculations that need deterministic, structurally enforced SQL
  6. Role-scoped files and auto-attach configuration once the baseline is stable